Demonstrable harm
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; [1996] EGCS 66(1) (13/04/96)Publication details: 1996Subject(s): Summary: "J Sainsbury plc and another v SoS Environment and another" QBD 3 April 1996. Two applications for planning permission - one for retail development including food store with shops and a car park and the second for retail development including foodstore, housing development and a retail warehouse and park. The land was outside Aylesbury town centre. Inspector found that the proposals would not enhance the town centre in accordance with Buckinghamshire`s structure plan. SoS Environment (X) agreed. S contended no demonstrable harm shown. X contended demonstrable harm is a policy not a legal concept. Applications refused.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | W13173 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 56922-1001 |
"J Sainsbury plc and another v SoS Environment and another" QBD 3 April 1996. Two applications for planning permission - one for retail development including food store with shops and a car park and the second for retail development including foodstore, housing development and a retail warehouse and park. The land was outside Aylesbury town centre. Inspector found that the proposals would not enhance the town centre in accordance with Buckinghamshire`s structure plan. SoS Environment (X) agreed. S contended no demonstrable harm shown. X contended demonstrable harm is a policy not a legal concept. Applications refused.