Hotel clash offers feast of debate
Language: English Series: Building ; 257(7740) 10 April 1992, 34(1)Publication details: 1992Subject(s): Summary: Picks out several points from a recent case, namely the identity of the clients as a company, the degree of supervision to be expected of the architect on the project, whether the architect was wrong to use JCT Minor Works Form of Contract and the calculation for the loss of profits to the clients through a four week delay in finishing the work.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS46186 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 57095-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Picks out several points from a recent case, namely the identity of the clients as a company, the degree of supervision to be expected of the architect on the project, whether the architect was wrong to use JCT Minor Works Form of Contract and the calculation for the loss of profits to the clients through a four week delay in finishing the work.