Standing in planning permission appeals
Language: English Series: Journal of Planning and Environment Law ; (1992) JPL 319-329(11)Publication details: 1992Subject(s):- BUXTON V MINISTER OF HOUSING AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT
- COOK V SOUTHEND BC
- PLANNING CONTROL
- PLANNING DECISIONS
- PLANNING PERMISSION
- SUPREME COURT ACT 1981
- THIRD PARTIES
- TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (APPEALS) WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS
- TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S288
- TURNER V SOS FOR THE ENVIRONMENT
- PLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS46282 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 57557-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Covers the two ways a third party can challenge planning decisions: an application for judicial review under Supreme Court Act 1981 s31 and an appeal against a decision of the SoS under Town and Country Planning Act 1990 s288. Debates the legal complexities of the courts` having to determine whether the interests of third parties allow their challenge in court and also the acknowledgement of greater public interest as opposed to private rights in development control.