Graham v Pitkin
Language: English Series: All England Law Reports ; (1992) 2 AllER 235-238(3)Publication details: 1992Subject(s): Summary: Privy Council 9 March 1992. It was held that unreasonable delay by the purchaser in completing the contract for the sale of land did not entitle the vendor to rescind the contract without first serving a notice to complete.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS46297 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 57639-1001 |
Privy Council 9 March 1992. It was held that unreasonable delay by the purchaser in completing the contract for the sale of land did not entitle the vendor to rescind the contract without first serving a notice to complete.