Rent review
Language: English Series: EGCS ; 1990 60Publication details: 1990Subject(s): Summary: In Lynnthorpe Enterprises Ltd v Sidney Smith (Chelsea) Ltd , CA 3 May 1990, it was held that the variation introduced by the deed of 1986 had the effect of removing the proviso that the lessor`s reasonable consent to a variation of user was required. The 1986 deed bound successors in title to the present appellants. The hypothetical term was a term of 15 years from 22 August 1978.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2619-46 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 57685-1001 |
In Lynnthorpe Enterprises Ltd v Sidney Smith (Chelsea) Ltd , CA 3 May 1990, it was held that the variation introduced by the deed of 1986 had the effect of removing the proviso that the lessor`s reasonable consent to a variation of user was required. The 1986 deed bound successors in title to the present appellants. The hypothetical term was a term of 15 years from 22 August 1978.