Forestry Commission v Grace and another
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (1992) 15 EG 115-116(2)Publication details: 1992Subject(s): Summary: CC 4 March 1992. The appellants, having been convicted of felling trees without a felling licence contrary to Forestry Act 1967 s17, claimed that the burden of proof fell on the defendants to demonstrate that a licence was required. The defendants contended that the appellants had to prove that the felling of trees came within the exception to the requirement for a licence under s9 of the Act. Appeal dismissed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS46313 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 57738-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
CC 4 March 1992. The appellants, having been convicted of felling trees without a felling licence contrary to Forestry Act 1967 s17, claimed that the burden of proof fell on the defendants to demonstrate that a licence was required. The defendants contended that the appellants had to prove that the felling of trees came within the exception to the requirement for a licence under s9 of the Act. Appeal dismissed.