Burton and another v MBC Limited and another
Language: English Series: Construction Industry Law Letter ; (1994) CILL 921-922(2)Publication details: 1994Subject(s): Summary: CA 25 January 1994. Held that a re-amendment of a claim against the builders of a bungalow which subsequently suffered from subsidence be allowed, as it did not prejudice the defendants. It is also a significant example of how long a straightforward building case can take, having been adjourned for two years. It will be due for hearing next year, seven years after proceedings were commenced.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS50817 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 58002-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
CA 25 January 1994. Held that a re-amendment of a claim against the builders of a bungalow which subsequently suffered from subsidence be allowed, as it did not prejudice the defendants. It is also a significant example of how long a straightforward building case can take, having been adjourned for two years. It will be due for hearing next year, seven years after proceedings were commenced.