Pollution: overlapping regimes
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; 1994 EGCS 92 (21/5/94)Publication details: 1994Subject(s): Summary: In "Gateshead MBC v SoS Environment and another" a proposal to erect a clinical waste incinerator was dismissed on the grounds that pollution control procedures would ensure that no environmental harm or pollution would arise, and this should not fetter planning inspector`s discretion to determine the application.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB3020-37 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 58438-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB3020-29 Lease obligation | WB3020-30 Lessee liability | WB3020-35 Conservation area | WB3020-37 Pollution: overlapping regimes | WB3020-39 Surveyors duty of care | WB3020-41 Negligent solicitors | WB3021-20 Monument |
In "Gateshead MBC v SoS Environment and another" a proposal to erect a clinical waste incinerator was dismissed on the grounds that pollution control procedures would ensure that no environmental harm or pollution would arise, and this should not fetter planning inspector`s discretion to determine the application.