Licence or lease
Language: English Series: EGCS ; (1989) 10Publication details: 1989Subject(s): Summary: In Nicolaou and Another v Pitt and Another CA 1 February 1989 it was held that two occupiers of a house were not to be believed that they intended to nominate a third occupier, that exclusive possession had in fact been granted and that the licence agreements amounted to a tenancy .| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2507-17 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 58590-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB2507-14 Land supply not wanting | WB2507-15 Land gained by adverse possession | WB2507-16 Cost of loss of quiet | WB2507-17 Licence or lease | WB2507-18 Restrictive covenants | WB2507-19 Terms of new lease | WB2507-20 Planning for SE |
In Nicolaou and Another v Pitt and Another CA 1 February 1989 it was held that two occupiers of a house were not to be believed that they intended to nominate a third occupier, that exclusive possession had in fact been granted and that the licence agreements amounted to a tenancy .