City of Glasgow DC & another v Mackie
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (1992) 20 EG 114-118(3)Publication details: 1992Subject(s): Summary: CS 25 July 1991. M, the respondent, had lost possession of a shop due to area redevelopment. Intended as a temporary measure, this became permanant through delays and M negotiated an end to his lease. The second appellant, Yoker, as agent of the first (G) completed the works, but became embroiled in a dispute with the LT over the level of disturbance payments. The jurisdiction of the LT to determine the amount was at issue. The appellants` case was rejected. Recourse to the courts was sought, whereat their appeal was allowed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS46642 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 58980-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
CS 25 July 1991. M, the respondent, had lost possession of a shop due to area redevelopment. Intended as a temporary measure, this became permanant through delays and M negotiated an end to his lease. The second appellant, Yoker, as agent of the first (G) completed the works, but became embroiled in a dispute with the LT over the level of disturbance payments. The jurisdiction of the LT to determine the amount was at issue. The appellants` case was rejected. Recourse to the courts was sought, whereat their appeal was allowed.