Dry rot claim succeeds
Language: English Series: EGCS ; (1988) 97Publication details: 1988Subject(s): Summary: In Ackerman and Another v Protim Services Ltd and Another CA 24 June 1988 the plaintiffs` claim against Protim for breach of guarantee was upheld on the grounds that an outbreak of dry rot was reactivated by a damp inner-wall face and as the wall was not as such defective, the infestation was not "as a result" of any failure by the plaintiffs to keep the property waterproof.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2427-14 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 59093-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB2427-11 Gas bill dispute | WB2427-12 Sick buildings probe | WB2427-13 IT design guide | WB2427-14 Dry rot claim succeeds | WB2427-15 Farm wildlife scheme | WB2427-16 Increase in 1992 awareness | WB2427-17 House price rise continues |
In Ackerman and Another v Protim Services Ltd and Another CA 24 June 1988 the plaintiffs` claim against Protim for breach of guarantee was upheld on the grounds that an outbreak of dry rot was reactivated by a damp inner-wall face and as the wall was not as such defective, the infestation was not "as a result" of any failure by the plaintiffs to keep the property waterproof.