Right of appeal limited
Language: English Series: Times ; 24 June 1993, 36(1)Publication details: 1993Subject(s): Summary: In "Quigley v Chief Land Registrar", CA 16 June 1993, it was held that Rule 299 of the Land Registration Rules 1925, as amended, was not intended to give a right of appeal to the Court of Appeal against every decision of the Land Registrar. The rule applied to an order or decision made by the registrar at a hearing under Rule 298.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB2924-53 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 59175-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB2924-44 Enforcement notice | WB2924-50 Assessment of damages | WB2924-52 First tenant liability | WB2924-53 Right of appeal limited | WB2924-54 Single registration sufficient | WB2924-59 Sale of cattle yard | WB2925-23 Housing CCT in Wales |
In "Quigley v Chief Land Registrar", CA 16 June 1993, it was held that Rule 299 of the Land Registration Rules 1925, as amended, was not intended to give a right of appeal to the Court of Appeal against every decision of the Land Registrar. The rule applied to an order or decision made by the registrar at a hearing under Rule 298.