Forte and Co Ltd v General Accident Life Assurance Ltd
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; 279(6302) 20 September 1986, 227-1238(6)Publication details: 1986Subject(s): Summary: ChD, 29 July 1986. A tenants' (F) summons for declarations in regard to rent review clauses affecting premises including the Cafe Royal in Regent Street. The proceedings were commenced so that an independent expert could be given guidance in the form of the six declarations sought. It was held that the premises should be valued subject to the underlease of part but otherwise with vacant possession; improvements should not be disregarded, as they were carried out in pursuance of an obligation to the immediate landlords. F's submission seeking to place a particular limited construction on the permitted user must be rejected. F's construction of provisions specifying the engines and machinery that might be installed in the premises was upheld.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS36859 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 704-1001 |
ChD, 29 July 1986. A tenants' (F) summons for declarations in regard to rent review clauses affecting premises including the Cafe Royal in Regent Street. The proceedings were commenced so that an independent expert could be given guidance in the form of the six declarations sought. It was held that the premises should be valued subject to the underlease of part but otherwise with vacant possession; improvements should not be disregarded, as they were carried out in pursuance of an obligation to the immediate landlords. F's submission seeking to place a particular limited construction on the permitted user must be rejected. F's construction of provisions specifying the engines and machinery that might be installed in the premises was upheld.