Interim payments
Language: English Series: Chartered Surveyor Weekly ; vol 22 no 10 10/3/88, p74Publication details: 1988Subject(s): Summary: In Gibbons and Another v Wall , CA 12 February 1988, it was held that there are often compelling reasons for a plaintiff to make an order 29 application (Rules of the Supreme Court) even in borderline cases.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2411-33 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 59343-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
In Gibbons and Another v Wall , CA 12 February 1988, it was held that there are often compelling reasons for a plaintiff to make an order 29 application (Rules of the Supreme Court) even in borderline cases.