Bairstow Eves (Securities) Ltd v Ripley
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (1992) 32 EG 52-55(4)Publication details: 1992Subject(s): Summary: CA 10 June 1992. An appeal by the landlord against a previous decision confirming a valid option to renew was successful. It was held that the tenants had not fulfilled their obligation to redecorate the premises within the last 12 months of the tenancy. The option to renew the tenancy was valid if all covenants had been respected.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS46934 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 60167-1001 |
CA 10 June 1992. An appeal by the landlord against a previous decision confirming a valid option to renew was successful. It was held that the tenants had not fulfilled their obligation to redecorate the premises within the last 12 months of the tenancy. The option to renew the tenancy was valid if all covenants had been respected.