Too `conservative` a solution? the conservation area test
Language: English Series: Modern Law Review ; 55(5) September 1992, 726-732(7)Publication details: 1992Subject(s): Summary: Discusses "Bath Society v SoS for the Environment" 1991 and "South Lakeland DC v SoS for the Environment and Carlisle Diocesan Parsonages" 1991 concerning the precise meaning and effect of the `conservation area test` as set out in Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 s72(1). Explains the difference between enhancing and preserving.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS47054 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 60616-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Discusses "Bath Society v SoS for the Environment" 1991 and "South Lakeland DC v SoS for the Environment and Carlisle Diocesan Parsonages" 1991 concerning the precise meaning and effect of the `conservation area test` as set out in Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 s72(1). Explains the difference between enhancing and preserving.