"Repair" reconsidered
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; 282(6331) 25 April 1987, 445-449(3)Publication details: 1987Description: (See also Abstracts 37009 and 37415)Subject(s):- ELITE INVESTMENTS LTD V TI BAINBRIDGE SILENCERS LTD
- ELMCROFT DEVELOPMENTS LTD V TANKERSLEY SAWYER
- HALLIARD PROPERTY CO LTD V NICHOLAS CLARKE INVESTMENTS LTD
- POST OFFICE V AQUARIUS PROPERTIES LTD
- QUICK V TAFF ELY BC
- RAVENSEFT PROPERTIES LTD V DAVSTONE HOLDINGS LTD
- STENT V MONMOUTH DC
- WAINWRIGHT V LEEDS CITY COUNCIL
- YANOVER V ROMFORD FINANCE AND DEVELOPMENT CO LTD
- Landlord and tenant
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS37700 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 6282-1001 |
With reference to caselaw, examines what constitutes 'repair' within the law of landlord and tenant. Pays particular attention to the cases "Elite Investments Ltd v T I Bainbridge Silencers Ltd", which referred to most of the major authorities on the subject, and "Post Office v Aquarius Properties Ltd", which questioned some of the established views.