Bhojwani and another v Kingsley Investment Trust Ltd
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (1992) 39 EG 138-144(4)Publication details: 1992Subject(s): Summary: ChD 21 May 1992. In March 1990 the plaintiffs, B, received notice under Law of Property Act 1925 s146 alleging breaches of various repairing covenants together with a schedule of dilapidations. The March instalment of rent was not paid. Two months later K, the defendants, reentered the premises. B claimed possession of the premises from K on the grounds that rentry was effected before a reasonable time for performance of the repair works had elapsed and it was therefore unlawful or they sought relief from forfeiture. They claimed £13,562 as damages for excessive distress alleging that K had impounded their stock valued at £15,00 in respect of outstanding rent of £1,437 and general damages for loss of profit and goodwill. K made a counterclaim for the outstanding quarters rent, damages for breach of the repairing covenant and a small sum for costs and expenses of reentry. In May 1991 K sold their freehold interest with vacant possession to S despite B`s claim for relief from forfeiture ...| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS47267 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 61309-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
ChD 21 May 1992. In March 1990 the plaintiffs, B, received notice under Law of Property Act 1925 s146 alleging breaches of various repairing covenants together with a schedule of dilapidations. The March instalment of rent was not paid. Two months later K, the defendants, reentered the premises. B claimed possession of the premises from K on the grounds that rentry was effected before a reasonable time for performance of the repair works had elapsed and it was therefore unlawful or they sought relief from forfeiture. They claimed £13,562 as damages for excessive distress alleging that K had impounded their stock valued at £15,00 in respect of outstanding rent of £1,437 and general damages for loss of profit and goodwill. K made a counterclaim for the outstanding quarters rent, damages for breach of the repairing covenant and a small sum for costs and expenses of reentry. In May 1991 K sold their freehold interest with vacant possession to S despite B`s claim for relief from forfeiture ...