Hillgate House Ltd v Expert Clothing Service and Sales Ltd
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; 282(6333) 9 May 1987, 715-718(2)Publication details: 1987Description: (See also Abstract 35326)Subject(s): Summary: ChD 24 July 1987. A preliminary point of law in a second action in which Hillgate House, the tenants, claimed damages against Expert Clothing, the landlords, in respect of taking possession of Hillgate House under a forfeiture order made in the first action, where the landlords were the plaintiffs and the tenants the defendants. (For the facts in the first action, see Abstract 35326). In the present action, the tenants claimed that acts carried out pursuant to the forfeiture order were unlawful. It was held that any acts done pursuant to an order of the court, which is valid until reversed, cannot be wrongful.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS37704 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 6313-1001 |
ChD 24 July 1987. A preliminary point of law in a second action in which Hillgate House, the tenants, claimed damages against Expert Clothing, the landlords, in respect of taking possession of Hillgate House under a forfeiture order made in the first action, where the landlords were the plaintiffs and the tenants the defendants. (For the facts in the first action, see Abstract 35326). In the present action, the tenants claimed that acts carried out pursuant to the forfeiture order were unlawful. It was held that any acts done pursuant to an order of the court, which is valid until reversed, cannot be wrongful.