Estate agent entitled to commission
Language: English Series: Times ; 24 May 1990, 38(1)Publication details: 1990Subject(s): Summary: In "Peter Yates and Co v Bullock and another" (CA, Abs43406) it was decided that an estate agent who introduced a vendor to a property is still entitled to his commission even though the sale was completed through another agent.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2620-48 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 61531-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB2620-45 New property company | WB2620-46 Professional identity problem | WB2620-47 Mixed planning permission | WB2620-48 Estate agent entitled to commission | WB2620-49 QS workload stable | WB2620-50 Revaluation and the retail sector | WB2620-51 BSE |
In "Peter Yates and Co v Bullock and another" (CA, Abs43406) it was decided that an estate agent who introduced a vendor to a property is still entitled to his commission even though the sale was completed through another agent.