Monument
Language: English Series: Independent ; 30 May 1994, 21(1)Publication details: 1994Subject(s): Summary: In "R v Bovis Construction Ltd" CA 5 May 1994, an appeal by B, convicted of causing works to be executed damaging a scheduled monument, was dismissed on the grounds that the definition of the scheduled monument was conclusive for the strict liability purposes of Ancient Monuments and Archaelogical Areas Act 1979 s2.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB3021-20 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 62025-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB3020-37 Pollution: overlapping regimes | WB3020-39 Surveyors duty of care | WB3020-41 Negligent solicitors | WB3021-20 Monument | WB3021-29 Set aside tenancy | WB3021-30 Insolvency | WB3021-31 Rent review |
In "R v Bovis Construction Ltd" CA 5 May 1994, an appeal by B, convicted of causing works to be executed damaging a scheduled monument, was dismissed on the grounds that the definition of the scheduled monument was conclusive for the strict liability purposes of Ancient Monuments and Archaelogical Areas Act 1979 s2.