Insolvency
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; (1994) EGCS 95 (28/5/94)Publication details: 1994Subject(s): Summary: In "Re Cranley Mansions Ltd; Saigol v Goldstein and another" ChD 13 May 1994 held that the shareholder of a management company, following insolvency of the company which had undertaken major repairs, was not entitled to vote and the voluntary arrangement was not binding upon her.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB3021-30 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 62081-1001 |
In "Re Cranley Mansions Ltd; Saigol v Goldstein and another" ChD 13 May 1994 held that the shareholder of a management company, following insolvency of the company which had undertaken major repairs, was not entitled to vote and the voluntary arrangement was not binding upon her.