IDC Group Ltd and others v Clark
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (1992) 49 EG 103-105(3)Publication details: 1992Subject(s): Summary: CA 2 July 1992. D brought an action against C, sublessee of a flat in adjoining premises, relating to an agreement in a deed which provided for a fire escape route through a party wall in to an area now occupied by C`s flat. At some point the doorway had been blocked, but it was not known when or by whom. D tried to get an injunction to open the doorway and claim damages in lieu. C provided an alternative escape and D could only claim damages. C contended that the original agreement in the deed was not a personal one and had not been brought to her attention when she bought the flat. This was upheld. D appealed. It was "held" that the appeal should be dismissed. (See also ABS45895)| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS47647 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 62810-1001 |
CA 2 July 1992. D brought an action against C, sublessee of a flat in adjoining premises, relating to an agreement in a deed which provided for a fire escape route through a party wall in to an area now occupied by C`s flat. At some point the doorway had been blocked, but it was not known when or by whom. D tried to get an injunction to open the doorway and claim damages in lieu. C provided an alternative escape and D could only claim damages. C contended that the original agreement in the deed was not a personal one and had not been brought to her attention when she bought the flat. This was upheld. D appealed. It was "held" that the appeal should be dismissed. (See also ABS45895)