Rent review
Language: English Series: EGCS ; 1988 101Publication details: 1988Subject(s): Summary: In Arnold and others v National Westminster Bank plc , ChD 1 July 1988, it was held that lessees are not estopped from raising the matter of construction and although the doctrine of issue estoppel is normally an absolute one, there are exceptions in special cases.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2428-14 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 62952-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB2428-10 Rising damp in the economy | WB2428-11 Boundaries | WB2428-13 Pressure to privatise land | WB2428-14 Rent review | WB2428-15 B1 ruling unlikely to change | WB2428-16 Hospital reform programme | WB2428-17 Housing trust estates named |
In Arnold and others v National Westminster Bank plc , ChD 1 July 1988, it was held that lessees are not estopped from raising the matter of construction and although the doctrine of issue estoppel is normally an absolute one, there are exceptions in special cases.