Peel Developments (South) Ltd v Siemens plc
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (1992) 47 EG 103-105(3)Publication details: 1992Subject(s): Summary: ChD 13 July 1992. Peel Developments (P) were landlords of the premises in question and the defendants Siemens plc (S) tenants on a 25.25 year lease with a break clause. Any notice to quit had to be served nine months before the end of the fifth year of term. S duly served notice, but P contended that the notice stated the wrong date and was served to an associated company Peel (South East) Ltd, not the landlord but the managing agents. It was "held" that no clause in the lease stated that notice should be addressed to the landlords, managing agents having sufficient authority, and the notice itself did not have to state 28 September 1991.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS47692 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 63085-1001 |
ChD 13 July 1992. Peel Developments (P) were landlords of the premises in question and the defendants Siemens plc (S) tenants on a 25.25 year lease with a break clause. Any notice to quit had to be served nine months before the end of the fifth year of term. S duly served notice, but P contended that the notice stated the wrong date and was served to an associated company Peel (South East) Ltd, not the landlord but the managing agents. It was "held" that no clause in the lease stated that notice should be addressed to the landlords, managing agents having sufficient authority, and the notice itself did not have to state 28 September 1991.