Repayment of rates
Language: English Series: Times ; 18/3/88, p30Publication details: 1988Subject(s): Summary: In R v Tower Hamlets London Borough Council Ex parte Chetnik Developments Ltd , HL 17 March 1988, it was held that where General Rate Act 1967 s9 authorised a refund of an amount paid in respect of rates in compliance with a demand which the ratepayer might successfully have resisted the rating authority should not retain such payments unless there were special circumstances in which a particular overpayment was made such as to justify retention.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2412-41 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 63264-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB2412-38 Disposal of house by consent | WB2412-39 Docklands rates bill | WB2412-40 Rates law amendment | WB2412-41 Repayment of rates | WB2412-42 Warehouses come of age | WB2412-43 Hampshire | WB2412-44 Budget 1988 |
In R v Tower Hamlets London Borough Council Ex parte Chetnik Developments Ltd , HL 17 March 1988, it was held that where General Rate Act 1967 s9 authorised a refund of an amount paid in respect of rates in compliance with a demand which the ratepayer might successfully have resisted the rating authority should not retain such payments unless there were special circumstances in which a particular overpayment was made such as to justify retention.