Esau Brothers v Rodd (VO)
Language: English Series: Rating Appeals ; (1992) RA 257-261(5)Publication details: 1992Subject(s): Summary: LT 9 November 1992. E`s property was entered in the 1990 non domestic rating list as `scrapyard and premises`. A proposal to alter the list was hand-delivered by E into the valuation officer`s (R) letter box at 4.10pm on 1 October 1990. On 26 October 1990 R issued a notice to E stating that he felt the proposal to be invalid. On 22 November 1990 E served notice of appeal against R`s decision. The VCCT decided the proposal was invalid as it had been served outside the six-months time limit set down in reg 9(2) of Non Domestic Rating (Alteration of Lists and Appeals) Regulations 1990. E appealed to the Lands Tribunal. It was "held" that the decision of the VCCT was plainly correct.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS47757 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 63338-1001 |
LT 9 November 1992. E`s property was entered in the 1990 non domestic rating list as `scrapyard and premises`. A proposal to alter the list was hand-delivered by E into the valuation officer`s (R) letter box at 4.10pm on 1 October 1990. On 26 October 1990 R issued a notice to E stating that he felt the proposal to be invalid. On 22 November 1990 E served notice of appeal against R`s decision. The VCCT decided the proposal was invalid as it had been served outside the six-months time limit set down in reg 9(2) of Non Domestic Rating (Alteration of Lists and Appeals) Regulations 1990. E appealed to the Lands Tribunal. It was "held" that the decision of the VCCT was plainly correct.