Court can overlook planning inspector`s error
Language: English Series: Independent ; 19 November 1992, 30(1)Publication details: 1992Subject(s): Summary: "PG Vallance Ltd v SoS for the Environment and another" QBD 13 October 1992. The court applied Rules of the Supreme Court Order 55 rule 7(7) to dismiss an application to appeal against a planning decision. Although it could have been argued that the planning inspector had erred, there had been no damage or miscarriage of justice.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB2845-47 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 63630-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
"PG Vallance Ltd v SoS for the Environment and another" QBD 13 October 1992. The court applied Rules of the Supreme Court Order 55 rule 7(7) to dismiss an application to appeal against a planning decision. Although it could have been argued that the planning inspector had erred, there had been no damage or miscarriage of justice.