Licencees or tenants?
Language: English Series: Solicitors` Journal ; Vol 131 No 118 27/11/87 p1560-61(1)Publication details: 1987Subject(s): Summary: Discusses the case Ashburn Anstalt v Arnold and Another (See WB2343-24), where the CA ruled that Arnold and his company were occupying the premises as tenants, and therefore could not be evicted by the plaintiff.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2348-28 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 63651-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB2348-25 Poisoned land cover-up ? | WB2348-26 Exclusive licences | WB2348-27 Landlord and Tenant Act | WB2348-28 Licencees or tenants? | WB2348-29 Possession order | WB2348-30 Secure tenancy | WB2348-31 City developers attacked |
Discusses the case Ashburn Anstalt v Arnold and Another (See WB2343-24), where the CA ruled that Arnold and his company were occupying the premises as tenants, and therefore could not be evicted by the plaintiff.