Secure tenancy
Language: English Series: Times ; 1/12/87 p36Publication details: 1987Subject(s): Summary: It was held, in Appleton v Aspin and Others CA 19 November 1987, that even when a landlord had agreed to sell premises with vacant possession to a purchaser, and at the same time the tenant, under a protected tenancy agreed with the purchaser not to enforce against him a right of possession, the court could not grant possession to the purchaser as against the tenant, unless conditions in Rent Act 1977 s98(1) were satisfied.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2348-30 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 63664-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB2348-27 Landlord and Tenant Act | WB2348-28 Licencees or tenants? | WB2348-29 Possession order | WB2348-30 Secure tenancy | WB2348-31 City developers attacked | WB2348-32 Derelict land development | WB2348-33 Enterprise Boards |
It was held, in Appleton v Aspin and Others CA 19 November 1987, that even when a landlord had agreed to sell premises with vacant possession to a purchaser, and at the same time the tenant, under a protected tenancy agreed with the purchaser not to enforce against him a right of possession, the court could not grant possession to the purchaser as against the tenant, unless conditions in Rent Act 1977 s98(1) were satisfied.