Ehmler and another v Hall
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (1993) 02 EG 115-117 (3)Publication details: 1993Subject(s): Summary: CA 31 July 1992. It was held that a landlord, who lost rent when his property was damaged by a motorcyclist, could claim loss of rent against the motorcyclist. "Rust v Victoria Graving Dock Co" (1887), cited by the appellants, in which a reversioner could only sue in respect of damage, which would continue to affect the property after the reversion of the lease, was not found to be applicable to this case.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS47879 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 63848-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
CA 31 July 1992. It was held that a landlord, who lost rent when his property was damaged by a motorcyclist, could claim loss of rent against the motorcyclist. "Rust v Victoria Graving Dock Co" (1887), cited by the appellants, in which a reversioner could only sue in respect of damage, which would continue to affect the property after the reversion of the lease, was not found to be applicable to this case.