New tenancy
Language: English Series: Independent ; 13/4/87 p18Publication details: 1987Subject(s): Summary: In Nozari-Zadeh v Pearl Assurance plc CA 3 April 1987, the striking out of the tenant`s application for a new tenancy because at the relevant time the premises were not "occupied by the tenant for the purposes of a business carried on by him".| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2316-25 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 64008-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB2316-19 Housing transfer | WB2316-20 Insurance to speed moving | WB2316-24 Invalid notices | WB2316-25 New tenancy | WB2316-26 Tenant`s covenants | WB2316-27 Service charge | WB2316-28 US property loans crisis |
In Nozari-Zadeh v Pearl Assurance plc CA 3 April 1987, the striking out of the tenant`s application for a new tenancy because at the relevant time the premises were not "occupied by the tenant for the purposes of a business carried on by him".