Valuation decisions
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; Vol 282 No 6329, 11/4/87 p219Publication details: 1987Subject(s): Summary: With reference to previous decisions concerning the differences between valuation and structural surveys , this article discusses the case Sutcliffe v Sayer CA 3 February 1987, where an estate agent instructed to give a valuation for a client was not expected to carry out a structural survey.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2316-41 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 64078-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB2316-38 Action on gazumping call | WB2316-39 Copyright infringement | WB2316-40 Solicitor acted unlawfully | WB2316-41 Valuation decisions | WB2316-42 Commission on letting | WB2316-43 Contractors` employees | WB2316-44 Legal duty of architect |
With reference to previous decisions concerning the differences between valuation and structural surveys , this article discusses the case Sutcliffe v Sayer CA 3 February 1987, where an estate agent instructed to give a valuation for a client was not expected to carry out a structural survey.