Contractors` employees
Language: English Series: Chartered Surveyor Weekly ; 19(3) 16/4/87 p51Publication details: 1987Subject(s): Summary: Discusses the outcome of the case Heasmans (a firm) v Clarity Cleaning Co Ltd CA 23 January 1987, which concerned an employee of the cleaning firm making phone calls on the clients premises without permission. The CA found that in the absence of an express term in the contract, the cleaning company and its insurers were not vicariously liable for the employee`s behaviour.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2316-43 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 64089-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB2316-40 Solicitor acted unlawfully | WB2316-41 Valuation decisions | WB2316-42 Commission on letting | WB2316-43 Contractors` employees | WB2316-44 Legal duty of architect | WB2316-45 Property purchase | WB2316-46 Blind bidding |
Discusses the outcome of the case Heasmans (a firm) v Clarity Cleaning Co Ltd CA 23 January 1987, which concerned an employee of the cleaning firm making phone calls on the clients premises without permission. The CA found that in the absence of an express term in the contract, the cleaning company and its insurers were not vicariously liable for the employee`s behaviour.