Legal duty of architect
Language: English Series: Independent ; 13/4/87 p18Publication details: 1987Subject(s): Summary: In Nye Saunders and Partners v Bristow CA 8 April 1987, it was held that an architect had a legal duty to "exercise the skills of his calling with reasonable care and prudence".| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2316-44 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 64091-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB2316-41 Valuation decisions | WB2316-42 Commission on letting | WB2316-43 Contractors` employees | WB2316-44 Legal duty of architect | WB2316-45 Property purchase | WB2316-46 Blind bidding | WB2316-47 BMI property maintenance |
In Nye Saunders and Partners v Bristow CA 8 April 1987, it was held that an architect had a legal duty to "exercise the skills of his calling with reasonable care and prudence".