No penalty for misrepresentation
Language: English Series: Contract Journal ; 366(5912) 18 February 1993, 13(1)Publication details: 1993Subject(s): Summary: "Convent Hospital Ltd v Eberlin and Partners" is one of few construction cases on fraudulent misrepresentation. The appellants, a firm of architects, were held by CA to be liable for negligence in not securing a performance bond as the bills of quantities required. Their claim for indemnity failed as the numerous false statements given by the third party, a firm of contractors, made no difference to E`s final course of action.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS47966 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 64230-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
"Convent Hospital Ltd v Eberlin and Partners" is one of few construction cases on fraudulent misrepresentation. The appellants, a firm of architects, were held by CA to be liable for negligence in not securing a performance bond as the bills of quantities required. Their claim for indemnity failed as the numerous false statements given by the third party, a firm of contractors, made no difference to E`s final course of action.