Image from Google Jackets

JCT87 limits redress over defective work

By: Language: English Series: Building ; 258(7780) 5 February 1993, 22-23(1)Publication details: 1993Subject(s): Summary: The case "GPT v Panatown" illustrates the difficulties an employer may find in recovering losses caused by the remedy of defective work from a project conducted under JCT87. Retention money may not provide appropriate security.

The case "GPT v Panatown" illustrates the difficulties an employer may find in recovering losses caused by the remedy of defective work from a project conducted under JCT87. Retention money may not provide appropriate security.