Property briefing
Language: English Series: Solicitors` Journal ; 137(5) 12 February 1993, 129(1)Publication details: 1993Subject(s): Summary: CA ruled in "Benn v Hardinge" 13 October that prolonged non-use of a right of way by the owner of a dominant tenement was not in itself sufficient grounds to assume its abandonment. Following precedent in "Gotobed v Pridmore" the judgement stated there must be a clear intention to abandon. The article also considers protection against distress for unpaid rent.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS48038 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 64571-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
CA ruled in "Benn v Hardinge" 13 October that prolonged non-use of a right of way by the owner of a dominant tenement was not in itself sufficient grounds to assume its abandonment. Following precedent in "Gotobed v Pridmore" the judgement stated there must be a clear intention to abandon. The article also considers protection against distress for unpaid rent.