Image from Google Jackets

Morbaine Ltd v SoS Environment and South Northampton DC and another

Language: English Series: Property and Compensation Reports ; (1994) 68 PCR 525-543(19)Publication details: 1994Subject(s): Summary: QBD 20 December 1993. Two applications were made for planning permission to develop supermarkets in the same town by C and H. M was H`s chosen developer and had an option to purchase the site. H`s application was called in by the SoS for determination. C appealed to the council (SN) to determine its application. SN requested that C`s should also be called in and a joint application issued. The SoS refused giving no reasons. An Inspector granted planning permission to C following an inquiry. M and SN applied under Town and Country Planning Act 1990 to quash the decision. C argued that M had no right to do this as they had not been present at the inquiry. SN also applied to quash the decision of the SoS to refuse to call in C`s application as the SoS was obliged to give his reasons. SoS`s decision quashed.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Law report London Journal article ABS52178 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 64721-1001

QBD 20 December 1993. Two applications were made for planning permission to develop supermarkets in the same town by C and H. M was H`s chosen developer and had an option to purchase the site. H`s application was called in by the SoS for determination. C appealed to the council (SN) to determine its application. SN requested that C`s should also be called in and a joint application issued. The SoS refused giving no reasons. An Inspector granted planning permission to C following an inquiry. M and SN applied under Town and Country Planning Act 1990 to quash the decision. C argued that M had no right to do this as they had not been present at the inquiry. SN also applied to quash the decision of the SoS to refuse to call in C`s application as the SoS was obliged to give his reasons. SoS`s decision quashed.