Nicholls v Wimbledon Valuation Office Agency & another
Language: English Series: Rating & Valuation Reporter ; (1995) 35 RVR 171(1)Publication details: 1995Subject(s): Summary: QBD 12 July 1995. The appellant claimed that his home was not subject to council tax, being a floating structure (not a boat) and not being fixed to land with a necessary degree of permanence. Appeal dismissed as the issue of permanence (whether agreed or not) was not raised at the valuation tribunal.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS53855 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 6931-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
QBD 12 July 1995. The appellant claimed that his home was not subject to council tax, being a floating structure (not a boat) and not being fixed to land with a necessary degree of permanence. Appeal dismissed as the issue of permanence (whether agreed or not) was not raised at the valuation tribunal.