Receivership is not a contract breach

By:

Powell-Smith, V

Language: English Series: Contract Journal ; 377(6010) 2 February 1995, 12(1)Publication details: 1995Subject(s):

Summary: "Perar BV v General Surety & Guarantee" CA 1994 highlights the problems of wording in performance bonds and the interpretation of `default` in cases of administrative receivership.

Holdings ( 1 )
Title notes ( 1 )

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Call number	Copy number	Status	Barcode
Journal article	London Journal article	ABS52228 (Browse shelf(Opens below))	1	Available	66855-1001

Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)

Previous	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	Next
Previous	ABS52225 JCT makes itself clear	ABS52226 Partnering : a common sense approach to preventing and managing claims	ABS52227 Pleading rolled-up claims	ABS52228 Receivership is not a contract breach	ABS52229 Strained relations	ABS52230 The EIC (European International Contractors) turnkey contract (Conditions for design and construct projects)	ABS52231 The new FIDIC International Civil Engineering Subcontract	Next

"Perar BV v General Surety & Guarantee" CA 1994 highlights the problems of wording in performance bonds and the interpretation of `default` in cases of administrative receivership.

Back to results

Print
Cite
Send to device
Save record
BIBTEX Dublin Core MARCXML MARC (non-Unicode/MARC-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8, Standard) MODS (XML) RIS ISBD
More searches

Search for this title in:
Other Libraries (WorldCat) Other Databases (Google Scholar) Open Library (openlibrary.org)