Building subcontract
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; (1989) EGCS 90Publication details: 1989Subject(s): Summary: In Architectural Installation Services Ltd v James Gibbons Windows Ltd QBD 14 June 1989 it was held that the termination of a subcontract by telex was lawful under common law but not lawful under Condition 8 of the subcontract.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB2525-09 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 66923-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB2443-29 Refusal of planning permission claim | WB2446-44 Recovery of service charges | WB2521-02 Judicial review | WB2525-09 Building subcontract | WB2525-17 Damages for tenancy loss | WB2525-18 Lodgers or tenants? | WB2526-09 CPO challenge fails |
In Architectural Installation Services Ltd v James Gibbons Windows Ltd QBD 14 June 1989 it was held that the termination of a subcontract by telex was lawful under common law but not lawful under Condition 8 of the subcontract.