Settlement negotiations inadmissible
Language: English Series: Independent ; 4/11/88 p16Publication details: 1988Subject(s): Summary: In Rush & Tompkins Ltd v Greater London Council and another , HL 3 November 1988, it was held that admissions made in ` without prejudice ` correspondence resulting in a settlement between two parties in multi-party litigation were inadmissible in evidence in any subsequent litigation connected with the same subject matter, and such correspondence was not discoverable to a third party in the litigation.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2445-06 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 67641-1001 |
In Rush & Tompkins Ltd v Greater London Council and another , HL 3 November 1988, it was held that admissions made in ` without prejudice ` correspondence resulting in a settlement between two parties in multi-party litigation were inadmissible in evidence in any subsequent litigation connected with the same subject matter, and such correspondence was not discoverable to a third party in the litigation.