Regulating development of green belt
Language: English Series: Times ; 11 November 1993, 38(1)Publication details: 1993Subject(s): Summary: "Good and another v Epping Forest DC" CA 5 November 1993. The appellants failed to have made null a covenant made under Town and Country Planning Act 1971 s52, which provided that a house on their land had to be occupied by a farm worker.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB2942-39 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 67706-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB2942-14 Compulsory purchase of commoners` land | WB2942-28 Possession order | WB2942-29 Right to buy | WB2942-39 Regulating development of green belt | WB2943-36 Rent Acts | WB2943-45 Consistency of decisions | WB2943-46 Green belt |
"Good and another v Epping Forest DC" CA 5 November 1993. The appellants failed to have made null a covenant made under Town and Country Planning Act 1971 s52, which provided that a house on their land had to be occupied by a farm worker.