Ward-Lee v Linehan
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (1993) 20 EG 125-128(4)Publication details: 1993Subject(s): Summary: CA 9 February 1993. The plaintiff(W) made a request to L for a new tenancy under Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 s26. L agreed but suggested a higher rent. The County Court did not serve proceedings on L to that effect despite having received the correct literature from W. The time-limit expired and L claimed W had lost her right to statutory renewal. W appealed against the decision that no extension of time would be granted. Appeal allowed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS48664 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 67888-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
CA 9 February 1993. The plaintiff(W) made a request to L for a new tenancy under Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 s26. L agreed but suggested a higher rent. The County Court did not serve proceedings on L to that effect despite having received the correct literature from W. The time-limit expired and L claimed W had lost her right to statutory renewal. W appealed against the decision that no extension of time would be granted. Appeal allowed.