Invoice case
Language: English Series: Chartered Surveyor Weekly ; vol 22 no 12 24/3/88, p80Publication details: 1988Subject(s): Summary: In British Coal Corporation v Dennis Rye Ltd and Another. CA 23 February 1988, the Corporation claimed overcharging on 227 invoices and by inference on others for work in connection with mining subsidence damage, it was held that no consistent system of overcharging could be proved.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2413-12 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 68146-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB2413-09 Two stage tendering | WB2413-10 Duty of care | WB2413-11 Inspection of sewers | WB2413-12 Invoice case | WB2413-13 National radiation monitoring network | WB2413-14 Standard of living league | WB2413-15 Attempt to harness wind |
In British Coal Corporation v Dennis Rye Ltd and Another. CA 23 February 1988, the Corporation claimed overcharging on 227 invoices and by inference on others for work in connection with mining subsidence damage, it was held that no consistent system of overcharging could be proved.