Negligence and time-limits
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (9322( 5 June 1993, 108(1)Publication details: 1993Subject(s): Summary: Discusses the decision "Felton v Gaskill Osbourne & Co" (1992), in which the plaintiff successfully claimed for damages for a negligent survey after dropping claims for certain items, which had been noticed and rectified at an earlier date, in anticipation of the defendant`s argument that action over these items was statute barred by limitation. Citing Limitation Act 1980 s14A, the remainder of the plaintiff`s claim was upheld. Appears to contradict "Horbury v Craig Hall & Rutley" (1992).| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS48870 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 68907-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Discusses the decision "Felton v Gaskill Osbourne & Co" (1992), in which the plaintiff successfully claimed for damages for a negligent survey after dropping claims for certain items, which had been noticed and rectified at an earlier date, in anticipation of the defendant`s argument that action over these items was statute barred by limitation. Citing Limitation Act 1980 s14A, the remainder of the plaintiff`s claim was upheld. Appears to contradict "Horbury v Craig Hall & Rutley" (1992).