Latent damages, negligent surveys
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (9631) 3 August 1996, 86(1)Publication details: 1996Subject(s):- FELTON V GASKILL OSBORNE & CO
- FORM OF DISCHARGE
- HAMLIN V EDWIN EVANS
- HORBURY V CRAIG HALL & RUTLEY
- LATENT DAMAGE ACT 1986
- LIMITATION ACT 1980 S14A
- LIMITATION PERIODS
- NEGLIGENCE CLAIMS
- PIRELLI GENERAL CABLE WORKS LTD V OSCAR FABER & PARTNERS
- SOS ENVIRONMENT V ESSEX GOODMAN & SUGGITT
- SURVEYORS
- VALUERS
- MANAGEMENT-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB3231-82 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 69878-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Discusses at what point the time bar comes into effect on claims against an allegedly negligent valuer or surveyor, in light of the recent case "Hamlin v Edwin Evans". Suggests that, as the `damage` a negligent valuer causes is that of overpayment for a property, the proper date for the start of the 3-year claims period is the date when the purchaser first becomes aware of any previously unknown major defect in the property.