No right of way for sheep
Language: English Series: Independent ; 16 January 1992, 28(1)Publication details: 1992Subject(s): Summary: In "Jones and others v Price and another", CA 15 January 1992, it was held that no right of way over land could be acquired by virtue of the Prescription Act 1832, so long as the way was used on a tacit understanding that permission, given before the start of the alleged prescription period, continued to be effective.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB2803-19 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 7368-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB2802-15 No indemnity costs for landlord | WB2803-06 Contractor : duty of care | WB2803-10 Secure tenants | WB2803-19 No right of way for sheep | WB2803-35 Contracting out | WB2803-36 Lease or licence | WB2803-55 Landlord : duty of care |
In "Jones and others v Price and another", CA 15 January 1992, it was held that no right of way over land could be acquired by virtue of the Prescription Act 1832, so long as the way was used on a tacit understanding that permission, given before the start of the alleged prescription period, continued to be effective.