Right to occupy
Language: English Series: Times ; 26/10/89 p42Publication details: 1989Subject(s): Summary: In Meyer v Riddick and Others CA 24 October 1989 it was held that where a landlord whose interest was held on trust , refused to grant a new tenancy on the ground that he intended to occupy the premises himself for business purposes, it was necessary that the occupation arose directly from his interest under the trust.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2542-19 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 71275-1001 |
In Meyer v Riddick and Others CA 24 October 1989 it was held that where a landlord whose interest was held on trust , refused to grant a new tenancy on the ground that he intended to occupy the premises himself for business purposes, it was necessary that the occupation arose directly from his interest under the trust.